Tag: still star-crossed

How to fix ABC in 5 easy steps [My Take]


As you probably all know by now, ABC is in trouble with two of their new shows, Notorious & Conviction, not surprisingly starting poorly, with no hope for potential recoveries over the next few weeks. They can’t even count on a good word of mouth: they were not well-liked by both critics and curious viewers. The question now is whether the network will let them stay on the schedule until the remainder of their initial order (which consists of 13 episodes), trim it to 10 or even less, or cancel them altogether with an immediate effect. Since ABC didn’t order that many new shows for the entire season overall, they will probably stick with them through the fall, at least.

Not everything is this dark for ABC though: Kiefer Sutherland-starrer Designated Survivor looks like a hit with very decent live numbers and huge DVR; and comedy Speechless fits perfectly with the ABC Funny line-up alongside The Goldbergs & Modern Family. American Housewife has yet to start but stuck between The Middle & Fresh Off The Boat, it’s expected to make decent numbers.

While making too many changes too soon is never a good idea, ABC has to make some anyway so they can stay competitive before starting anew next season, with the first shows developed by the new regime. And by the look of things, Channing Dungey shouldn’t rely too much on procedurals: that’s simply not ABC’s brand, even if they’re more profitable when they actually work.



Unless ABC can start the 6th season of Scandal sooner than expected -I doubt it because of Kerry Washington’s pregnancy- they can’t let their best drama lead-in –Grey’s Anatomy– go to waste (Notorious). Since HTGAWM has a hard time at 10 with its live numbers -the +3 & +7 are still potent- it wouldn’t hurt to move it to 9 where it can do a little bit better. The more they wait, the less the move will be effective. They can put Notorious at 10 or…



Is it too late so save the L+7 blockbuster? Probably. At least, the show helps keeping the lights on at 10 on sundays, where anything new would crash and burn. And that’s probably why they decided to keep it that way this season. BUT as numbers suggest, Quantico is not dead. Not yet. And it’s still an asset for the network. Giving it a push at 10 on thursdays, which was not possible when the TGIT was still a thing, is now very much possible. It probably won’t rise that much, but any rise is good to take, even for a few weeks! Justice for Quantico!



They’d make a perfect march, wouldn’t they? Of course, ABC will be tempted to launch the Shondaland’s Romeo & Juliet soap on their TGIT night come spring, but it certainly would be a better fit with The Bachelor, which is now, by the way, a better lead-in than Dancing With The Stars on the demo. They could also put it on sundays after Once Upon A Time, and it’d be fine but not ideal. If ABC wants a try at another hit this season, they know what to do…



Don’t make the same mistake you did with Forever, ABC. There are still very angry fans out there, and we can’t really blame them. What you did with Forever made sense somehow but you could have handled things better and give it a push. Give Time After Time -which is not that different tonally- a real chance to shine and find its audience, even though it’s not produced in-house but by Warner Bros. once again. And what does it mean precisely? Don’t hide it somewhere at 10. Don’t put it after Dancing With The Stars for example. It wouldn’t be a good fit. Don’t waste it on fridays. But you’re not FOX, I guess you would never do that, right? So what? Yes, it’s a difficult timeslot but sundays at 9 seems to be the best option. Once Upon A Time is not a good lead-in anymore, but at least Time After Time is compatible with it. Doing the same numbers or slightly better would be a victory of some sort.



Meaning doing this (either during the winter hiatus -if there’s one- or this spring)…




I know most of you will call me crazy but it’s all about changing the narrative! Let me explain. Can we agree that ABC is dead on sunday for multiple reasons (football on NBC, no sports before 8 to support the night like this is the case on CBS, The Walking Dead on AMC… and of course shows which are not Desperate Housewives)? Yes we can. What if ABC self-proclaimed sunday night as their “prestige night” by scheduling there the shows that critics give much praise to but viewers don’t massively go to? The only “veteran” American Crime could be put at the center, at 9. Right before that, they have two midseason comedies waiting in the wings with a real cable feel: Imaginary Mary & Downward Dog. Make it a combo. And put When We Rise, a period drama about the LGBT movement, at 10. ABC could use the Oscars to promote the four of them heavily for a March launch. Of course, the numbers won’t be impressive but at least ABC could proudly turn a bad night into a prestige night where numbers don’t matter that much.


What’s your opinion? Feel free to comment!

Still Star-Crossed (ABC) pilot preview: Shonda Rhimes goes all Shakespearian and Downton Abbey


Created and executive produced by Heather Mitchell (Scandal, Grey’s Anatomy). Based on Melinda Traub‘s novel. Directed by Michael Offer (How To Get Away With Murder, Homeland, Longmire). Also executive produced by Shonda Rhimes, Betsy Beers (How To Get Away With Murder, Scandal, Grey’s Anatomy) & Michael R. Goldstein (Rodney) & José Luis Escolar (Cloud Atlas, Kingdom of Heaven, Indiana Jones and the Last Cruisade). For ABC, ABC Studios, Shondaland Productions & The MrG Production Co. 64 pages.

Description: In the 16th century Verona, the deaths of Romeo and Juliet have escalated the feud between the Montagues and the Capulets. The streets of Verona have become dangerous, traitors have emerged, and the kingdom is vulnerable to attack. The young ruling Prince of Verona, Escalus, wants to end the feud and bring peace to the kingdom. Following the sage advice of his sister Princess Isabella he devises a plan to marry a Capulet to a Montague to unite the families and strengthen his position. He commands a union between Romeo’s cousin, the womanizing Benvolio, with Juliet’s cousin, Rosaline, who is in love with Prince Escalus. Each is fiery and independent. They’ll have to banter their way to a compromise in the midst of treachery, power grabs and palace intrigue. Another star-crossed love story begins.

With Lashana Lynch, Sterling Sulieman (The Vampire Diaries, Pretty Little Liars), Torrance Coombs (Reign, The Tudors), Zuleikha Robinson (Lost, Homeland, Rome, The Lone Gunmen), Grant Bowler (Lost, Ugly Betty, Defiance, True Blood), Anthony Head (Buffy, Merlin, Dominion, Free Agents), Medalion Rahimi (The Catch), Wade Briggs (Please Like Me), Ebonée Noel, Dan Hildebrand (Sons of Anarchy, Deadwood) and guest-stars Clara Rugaard as Juliet & Lucien Laviscount as Romeo (Scream Queens, Episodes).

rate rate rate

We probably all had the same reaction when we learned the Shondaland pilot of the year for ABC was 1/ a period drama 2/ a sequel to Romeo & Juliet: we laughed hysterically and cried a little. And now, it’s time for a little prayer. Make it work. Make it beautiful. Make it modern, somehow. Make it the Downton Abbey of Shonda Rhimes. She always said she was a big fan of the UK show (which is huge in the US too). Some say she’s “the Shakespeare of our time” (and yes, it’s too much). In 2016, we celebrate the 400th birthday of the author’s death. There’s no coincidence, if you ask me. This will be probably get ordered no matter what. Let’s see if it’s worth it or if it’s just saying “yes” to everything Shonda initiates.

For many years, networks worked on modern incarnations of cult Romeo & Juliet. At least one project like this is in development every year. And none of them hit the air in the end. Maybe because Shakespearian tales fuel soap operas for decades, whether consciously or not. The tragedies he wrote are timeless and still resonate with our world, our lives. In that regard, those projects had nothing special going on for them. Maybe the right way to go was this all along and nobody believed in it, or was up to the challenge: adaptating the original story as a period drama and going even further. And asking the crucial question: what happens in Verona once Romeo & Juliet are dead? Still Star-Crossed, despite its flaws, boldly goes in that direction and never apologizes for it.

More specifically, the first two acts are dedicated to tell the story of Romeo & Juliet respectfully. I wouldn’t say it’s boring but we all know how it plays out and how it’s gonna end. Honestly, I don’t know if they could have done otherwise. For the few (young?) people who don’t know it or for those who don’t remember it well, it seemed to be inevitable. Plus, since Romeo & Juliet are those who started the war, it would have been strange not to meet them. And it’s better than flashbacks. The good thing is we’re introduced through their last days to the characters that will play huge parts in the rest of the show, from delivish Lady Capulet and her coward of a husband to Mercutio, and Rosaline, and Tybalt… The list goes on and on. Maybe that’s the biggest problem here: too many characters and very little time to serve them correctly.

This is mostly a premise pilot, that sets up the situations and the relationships for the remainder of the season. Don’t expect too many twists and turns. There are but it’s not the point. And there’s plenty to do starting from here, though I don’t think the first season will consist of more than 13 episodes, since it looks like a midseason entry and the budget will be high with a shooting in Spain. That’s probably for the best. It needs to be prestigious and strong. 22 episodes wouldn’t suit it well. Look at Reign on The CW, in the same vein: it is quite good but the first seasons were way too long. It lost my interest. They have to avoid that at any cost, even if it becomes a success. It needs to be an event. Its built-in brand appeal already makes it an important appointment.

I don’t want to be too specific about what happens in the pilot, I’d just say it’s more exciting than I expected, quite well-written, and it can also appeal to those, like me, who are not fans of period pieces. Treachery, power grabs and palace intrigue are at the center, and it’s not that hard to connect with the characters. They feel modern. The women are, definitely. I have a harder time with the men, it will probably take more time to like them. The show is clearly geared towards women. Unfortunately, it lacks humor and eccentricity for my tastes. I couldn’t stop thinking of the movie Romeo + Juliet, with Claire Danes & Leonardo DiCaprio. It was brilliant, we’re far from it. There are no A-listers in the cast but some people we will be happy to meet again.

Still Star-Crossed seems to be a no-brainer for a pick-up at ABC, not because it’s incredibly good but because it’s different from what networks are used to, because it has a real appeal and already make people curious, and because it’s from Shonda Rhimes of course. It’s a risk worth taking, as long as they play their cards right.